On Sep 5, 2014 1:20 PM, "Avri Doria" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi,

and the more the better.

please get your organizations to sign.


avri


On 05-Sep-14 12:07, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> since I didn't see objections in the list, I think that NCSG can endorse
> the letter and I am going to do so in the website.
> Thanks everybody for expressing strong support for the statement, really
> appreciated.
> as Stephanie highlighted, everybody can sign as individual or on behalf of
> his/her organisation http://www.igfcontinuation.org/.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-09-05 16:34 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin <
> [log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Dear all,
>> We could use a few more individual signatures on the IGF continuation
>> list.  It looks like we are more likely to have congruent letters of
>> support from Business and Industry, and government, and I would rather do
>> that than drop the draft to the lowest common denominator.  So far I have
>> collected 16 names of individuals and 4 organizations, so I am asking you
>> if you could possibly see your way to signing, it would be very helpful.
>> This looks a bit pathetic.  Please distribute to your networks and ask them
>> to sign on. (unless, of course, you dont agree that the IGF should
>> continue...)
>> thanks!
>> Stephanie Perrin
>>
>> PS you can now sign on yourself on the website..http://www.
>> igfcontinuation.org/
>>
>