Hi,I could try to consolidate the comments submitted by NCSG members into one document and see if folks like it. I believe that they all cover different and important aspects of why the proposed by-laws amendment is really bad!!Thanks.AmrOn Sep 10, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Hi,_______________________________________________Thanks Avri again for submitting your contribution and sharing it with us.we had discussion within NCSG list about the proposal and maybe it is time to summarise a common position on that matter. we need volunteer(s) to collect the opinions shared in the list and draft a comment for review. the deadline is 14th september but we have still the reply period we can use to submit our comment.@Amr @Kathy you participated in the discussion is it possible to volunteer for drafting a NCSG contribution?Thanks!Best,Rafik---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2014-09-09 3:23 GMT+09:00
Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Submitted individual comment on GAC advice amendment
To: [log in to unmask]
Hi,
I submitted an individual comment.
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bylaws-amend-gac-advice-15aug14/msg00017.html
avri
PC-NCSG mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg