we meet again Monday.
there is a drive to finalize at that meeting so that if can be
on the agenda for the next GNSO mtg.
-------- Original Message --------
Hi all,
Here attached are the redline and clean versions of the charter
incorporating comments from Bart, Matthew, and Izumi.
Izumi ‹ I think your main concern (if I read your edits correctly) was
keeping the line about the mailing list. That line is still in the charter,
but I had moved it down one paragraph in the last draft iteration to include
it with other tools for the CCWG.
Main changes:
* Accepted all of Bart's and Matthew's edits
* Per Matthew's comment about clarity between the two cross community
groups, I changed CCWG to "CCWG-Accountability" and CWG to "CWG-Stewardship"
in the whole text
* Per Matthew's comment about "other groups'" I included a link to the ICG
RFP and wrote out who those łother groups˛ are (the numbers and protocol
parameters communities)
Some comments were unanswered, so I have copied them below for discussion on
the list. They are in the redline, but I made the clean version "really
clean" so that it's easy to circulate to your communities.
* (Grace) referring to the stakeholder definition: Should we include a
citation? The definition text seems to be in a pay-only document.
http://www.efqm.org/understanding-an-organisations-stakeholders
* Action: Keith to provide questions asap no later then Monday
Talk to you on Monday,
Grace