On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Milton,
> 
> I would suggest that NCSG not only give some members "the pen" to work on documents, but assign "a gavel" to one member who can first warn of deadlines, and then pound the gavel and say "document closed and sent".
> Many of the nuances that are important don't really get carved in stone when documents are tabled and get struggled with in the ongoing processes. It is better to submit a more-or-less consensus document with a few warts to be struggled over later, than to submit no document at all.
> 
> Sam L.
> 
> On 26/02/2015 9:32 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> Well, the CWG meeting discussing the surveys was this morning. Early.
>> I wasn't able to attend, so maybe someone else can tell us whether we missed the boat.
>> Probably so. This is very frustrating.