[log in to unmask]"
type="cite">
Hi Lori
Actually, I think this
is very healthy and useful discussion. I don’t actually sense
that there's antipathy at work here, but rather just a desire
for clarity and transparency about what we’re all doing why and
who we’re doing it with. That is in everyone’s interest.
I think it’d be great if
NPOC really focused in on operational concerns such as trademark
protection for CSOs. That it would do so was the understanding
we reached with Debbie and Amber at the Cartagena meeting in
December 2010 when they agreed to change the name from the
proposed Not-for-Profit Constituency (which was problematic
since NCUC’s members are also nonprofit) to the Not-for-Profit
Operational Concerns Constituency, but subsequently things often
got more blurry. ... [Text deleted ]