What about my implanted medical devices (fortunately numbering 0 at the moment....):-) SP On 2015-03-27 8:54, Sam Lanfranco wrote: > Seun & Stephanie, > > You will not have to add a domain name to your vehicle for it to be > accessed. Your vehicle will have an Internet identity independent of > anything you do. Mobil devices, e.g. cell phones, have unique mobile > identification numbers (MIN), and so will your car. Vehicles have > in-car diagnostic networks, and increasingly come with standard > factory installed features that use cell technology to link to the > Internet. The data privacy issues here are the same as in other areas. > Who owns the data? Who has access to it? -and- What is it used for? > > Sam L > > On 27/03/2015 4:28 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote: >> >> Hi Stephanie, >> >> Replying to your question (re: who owns domain of your car), first I >> like to say there is practically no way your Honda will be accessible >> by domain without the domain being added in the first place so you >> will be making an informed decision by adding the domain. However if >> there arise a technology that hard-codes domain on your Honda, you >> will also need to make decision to connect device on the network with >> an IP address before the domain can be reachable publicly. >> So the question would be, how informed will users be by then. I don't >> really think domain registration would be a big concern by then. >> >> Cheers! >> >> sent from Google nexus 4 >> kindly excuse brevity and typos. >> >> On 27 Mar 2015 06:47, "Stephanie Perrin" >> <[log in to unmask] >> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> I certainly am. I am curious to know whether domains are going >> to be involved, and if so who will register them (i.e. will >> Steph's Honda, and all the tattle tale devices in it be >> accessible on a domain, and if so who owns the domain....Honda, >> my insurance company, the device companies, the apps, or me???) >> SP >> >> On 2015-03-27 0:37, James Gannon wrote: >> >> I do some work and research in this area, if someone reminds >> me next week after Im back from the CWG F2F i can do up some >> info on this for the group if anyone is interested? >> >> On 27 Mar 2015, at 02:59, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask] >> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> Stephanie, >> >> This has been on the agenda and worried about for some >> time. The "connected-car" is but one data source in the >> Internet of Things (IoT). Everything written in this >> piece will apply to your IoT stove, frig, children's >> coat, garage door, furnace, light switch....you name it. >> One approach is to say all data is privately owned and >> that the data miners have to negotiate for what they have >> access to within the privately owned data. >> >> Sam L. >> >> >> On 26/03/2015 4:59 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: >> >> Folks interested in privacy may find this report on >> the connected car interesting, if alarming. The >> report was written by Philippa Lawson, a well known >> Canadian privacy lawyer who was for several years >> heading up CIPPIC in Ottawa. This privacy research >> was funded under the Canadian Privacy Commissioner's >> grants and contributions program. >> https://fipa.bc.ca/connected-car/ >> Stephanie Perrin >> >> >> - >> >