What about my implanted medical devices (fortunately numbering 0 at the moment....) :-)
SP
On 2015-03-27 8:54, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">
Seun & Stephanie,

You will not have to add a domain name to your vehicle for it to be accessed. Your vehicle will have an Internet identity independent of anything you do. Mobil devices, e.g. cell phones, have unique mobile identification numbers (MIN), and so will your car. Vehicles have in-car diagnostic networks, and increasingly come with standard factory installed features that use cell technology to link to the Internet. The data privacy issues here are the same as in other areas. Who owns the data? Who has access to it? -and- What is it used for?  

Sam L

On 27/03/2015 4:28 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

Hi Stephanie,

Replying to your question (re: who owns domain of your car), first I like to say there is practically no way your Honda will be accessible by domain without the domain being added in the first place so you will be making an informed decision by adding the domain. However if there arise a technology that hard-codes domain on your Honda, you will also need to make decision to connect device on the network with an IP address before the domain can be reachable publicly.
So the question would be, how informed will users be by then. I don't really think domain registration would be a big concern by then.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.

On 27 Mar 2015 06:47, "Stephanie Perrin" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I certainly am.  I am curious to know whether domains are going to be involved, and if so who will register them (i.e. will Steph's Honda, and all the tattle tale devices in it be accessible on a domain, and if so who owns the domain....Honda, my insurance company, the device companies, the apps, or me???)
SP

On 2015-03-27 0:37, James Gannon wrote:
I do some work and research in this area, if someone reminds me next week after Im back from the CWG F2F i can do up some info on this for the group if anyone is interested?

On 27 Mar 2015, at 02:59, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Stephanie,

This has been on the agenda and worried about for some time. The "connected-car" is but one data source in the Internet of Things (IoT). Everything written in this piece will apply to your IoT stove, frig, children's coat, garage door, furnace, light switch....you name it. One approach is to say all data is privately owned and that the data miners have to negotiate for what they have access to within the privately owned data.

Sam L.


On 26/03/2015 4:59 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
Folks interested in privacy may find this report on the connected car interesting, if alarming.  The report was written by Philippa Lawson, a well known Canadian privacy lawyer who was for several years heading up CIPPIC in Ottawa.  This privacy research was funded under the Canadian Privacy Commissioner's grants and contributions program.   https://fipa.bc.ca/connected-car/
Stephanie Perrin

-