+1 Cheers ! -Olévié- 2015-03-04 5:22 GMT+00:00 Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>: > Hi Amr, > > thanks for the reminder, and looking for the draft. > we can setup a webinar for this topic to work next week on NCSG comment > and explain about the report. such confcall helped us for the NCSG answer > to IANA stewardship transition CWG. > details about the webinar will be sent later. > > Best, > > Rafik > > 2015-03-04 0:12 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>: > >> Hi again, >> >> Like I said on another thread, the public comment period for this initial >> report has been extended to March 17th. At this point, it'd be really good >> to start getting some feedback/input. I'd also be happy to answer any >> questions. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Amr >> >> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > One of the currently open public comment periods is for the GNSO >> Policy/Implementation Working Group initial report and recommendations. The >> public comment period closes on March 3rd. Details on that can be found >> here: >> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en >> > >> > Normally public comments are submitted via email after drafting, >> however, this working group members have developed a survey to help them >> get answers to specific questions. This does not preclude the option of >> sending in free text comments as part of the survey or separately. >> > >> > Several NCSG members participated in this working group, and I am >> personally largely in support of the recommendations it has made. It has >> come up with some very interesting principles it is asking the GNSO and >> ICANN board to adopt in relation to gTLD policy development and >> implementation. Additionally, it is proposing three new processes to be >> used under certain circumstances as well as formalising the role of >> implementation review teams; to keep the GNSO engaged with the Global >> Domains Division (GDD) of ICANN during policy implementation. >> > >> > I do have a few minor issues that I tried to make clear in a draft >> response to the survey that I'm drafting on behalf of the NCSG. I've >> attached that to this email, and would very much appreciate feedback before >> the policy committee has a go at it. If there are folks out there who are >> interested in GNSO processes, then please go through the working group's >> initial report. It's actually really good stuff. Be warned though that it >> isn't exactly light reading. :) >> > >> > I'd be happy to answer any questions if anyone's got 'em. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > Amr >> > >> > <NCSG response to PI WG initial report survey questions - Draft.pdf> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PC-NCSG mailing list >> [log in to unmask] >> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg >> > > -- Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI Responsable du Projet CERGI Education Directeur-Adjoint de KT Technologies Informatiques sarl SG de ESTETIC - Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC ( http://www.estetic.tg) ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et http://www.npoc.org/) Membre du FOSSFA (www.fossfa.net) et Membre de de Internet Society ( www.isoc.org) BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72 Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo