+1
Cheers !
-Olévié-


2015-03-04 5:22 GMT+00:00 Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>:

> Hi Amr,
>
> thanks for the reminder, and looking for the draft.
> we can setup a webinar for this topic to work next week on NCSG comment
> and explain about the report. such confcall helped us for the NCSG answer
> to IANA stewardship transition CWG.
> details about the webinar will be sent later.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2015-03-04 0:12 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Like I said on another thread, the public comment period for this initial
>> report has been extended to March 17th. At this point, it'd be really good
>> to start getting some feedback/input. I'd also be happy to answer any
>> questions.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > One of the currently open public comment periods is for the GNSO
>> Policy/Implementation Working Group initial report and recommendations. The
>> public comment period closes on March 3rd. Details on that can be found
>> here:
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en
>> >
>> > Normally public comments are submitted via email after drafting,
>> however, this working group members have developed a survey to help them
>> get answers to specific questions. This does not preclude the option of
>> sending in free text comments as part of the survey or separately.
>> >
>> > Several NCSG members participated in this working group, and I am
>> personally largely in support of the recommendations it has made. It has
>> come up with some very interesting principles it is asking the GNSO and
>> ICANN board to adopt in relation to gTLD policy development and
>> implementation. Additionally, it is proposing three new processes to be
>> used under certain circumstances as well as formalising the role of
>> implementation review teams; to keep the GNSO engaged with the Global
>> Domains Division (GDD) of ICANN during policy implementation.
>> >
>> > I do have a few minor issues that I tried to make clear in a draft
>> response to the survey that I'm drafting on behalf of the NCSG. I've
>> attached that to this email, and would very much appreciate feedback before
>> the policy committee has a go at it. If there are folks out there who are
>> interested in GNSO processes, then please go through the working group's
>> initial report. It's actually really good stuff. Be warned though that it
>> isn't exactly light reading. :)
>> >
>> > I'd be happy to answer any questions if anyone's got 'em.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Amr
>> >
>> > <NCSG response to PI WG initial report survey questions - Draft.pdf>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>
>


-- 
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
Responsable du Projet CERGI Education
Directeur-Adjoint de KT Technologies Informatiques sarl
SG de ESTETIC  - Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC (
http://www.estetic.tg)
ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et
http://www.npoc.org/)
Membre du FOSSFA (www.fossfa.net) et Membre de de Internet Society (
www.isoc.org)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo