Milton/All
I'm sure this was talked about at length during the development of the
proposal, but it does seem rather odd to me that "functional and
legal separation" between the IANA naming functions and ICANN (which
I agree is an important principle) has been implemented in this proposal
by means of setting up a new corporation that is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of ICANN's (with an ICANN-designated Board - sec
III.A.i.b). Can you say a few words as to why you think that
provides for the necessary independence? The PTI Board will be
answerable to the ICANN Board, because ICANN is the only
"member" of PTI - ??
David
The At 10:58 AM 4/23/2015, Milton L Mueller wrote:
Dear NCSG-ers:
The domain names part of the IANA
transition is finally being formed. A draft proposal was released
yesterday and it is open for public comment.
In my view, this is a big win for accountability. By legally separating
the IANA functions operator from ICANN, it will be easier to hold ICANN’s
board and staff accountable for the policy making process, and easier to
hold the post-transition IANA accountable for its performance of the IANA
functions. Lines of responsibility will be more direct, and policy more
clearly separated from implementation.
The proposal also promotes accountability by creating a periodic review
process that could allow the names community to “fire” the existing IANA
if there was great dissatisfaction with its performance. This enhances
the accountability sought by the numbers and protocols communities as
well as creating separability for the names community for the first time.
The legal affiliate structure seems to have found the middle ground in
the debate over ICANN’s role in the IANA functions. Although IANA will
still be a subsidiary of ICANN, Inc., thus defusing any concerns about
creating new organizations, it will have a separate board and a clearer
line of demarcation between the politics of ICANN the policy maker and
the technical coordination functions provided by the IANA functions
operator.
You can read the (very long) proposal here:
https
://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-04-22-en
You can comment on it here:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en
*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America
Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose)
http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music
http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc.
http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************