Thanks Rafik, these points have helped me appreciate what is really at stake here. Apart from the cosmetics, I think the points are wide enough to allow an informed debate. However, apart from the first point, it looks like the other points would fit very well as sub points of the one on fiduciary responsibilities as that term tends to be quite wide. They can also still stand alone and be debated as standalone points, but I suggest that in the final draft, they should be arranged in such a way that they flow logically.

On 15 May 2015 at 01:11, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi everyone,

resending this email trying to capture and summarise , I may miss some parts, the ongoing discussion to pick-up topics. I think we have this rough list:
  1.  beyond new gTLDs: what next for ICANN naming policy?
  2. why they think ICANN should have a monopoly on IANA functions  - why the community should not be able to periodically review their performance and seek bids from alternate providers.
  3. what the board thinks is, and is not, its fiduciary responsibility and to whom?
  4. How "public interest commitments"  relate to the bottom-up policy development process at ICANN. What are the Board's plans for enforcing these PICs?  is e.g. copyright or other IP enforcement part of the plan?
there was some points Global Public Interest with regard to GNSO made policy but also mention of implementation review role, @Avri do you have wording for that topic?
Any help to tweak and edit those proposals will be helpful. we should be more clear and explain the rationale behind those topics since board members are supposed to prepare few weeks in advance

We can send a short list to the board by the end of this week, while we continue the discussion and share opinions . That will be our preparation for the substantive discussion during the joint-session. With the new format proposed by the ICANN board, we would expect more interactive discussion.

Best,

Rafik

2015-05-07 22:08 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>:
Hi everyone,

please suggest 2 or 3 topics we should discuss with ICANN board during our joint-session in ICANN meeting.

Best,

Rafik 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2015-04-27 20:10 GMT+09:00
Subject: [Poll] topics of interest for the ICANN Board-NCSG session in Buenos Aires
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>


Hi everyone,

earlier that usual, we should find out the topics we would like to discuss with ICANN board in Buenos Aires meeting. we will try first to get several suggestions, then later we can narrow them to 3 topics for example. we have deadline for 15th May.

this will allow more time for us and the board itself to prepare for the session. The ICANN board chair sent also a letter with suggestion for new format for that session, but also for a Board - Stakeholders Groups plenary session with agreed topics. please find more details in the attached document. I do think that is good step to improve the dialogue between the community and the board

so feel free to propose topics and please add 1 or 2 lines to explain what you think we should discuss on those issues.

Best Regards,

Rafik






--
Arthur Ernest Gwagwa
Legal Counsel, The Chambers
11th Floor Old Mutual Centre
Harare, Zimbabwe
LinkedIn:    www.linkedin.com/in/arthurgwagwa
Academia: https://independent.academia.edu/ArthurGwagwa