Forgive what may be a very stupid question, but I remain confused about something.
Earlier in this thread, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
In the current configuration, PTI is not in the position to issue RFP, it's rather the parent (ICANN) that is in the position to issue RFP based on the recommendation of IRF team/possible escalation from CSC. The later which is not yet very clear. So PTI is basically entering the current shoes of ICANN and ICANN will be entering the shoes of NTIA post-transition.
These aren't consistent with one another, are they? If Seun's description is correct, PTI takes over for ICANN and ICANN takes over for NTIA; PTI decides [via its own processes] on root zone changes, and sends them to ICANN for approval. "Policy-making" for the root is PTI's job (the way that, currently, it's ICANN's job); ICANN's job is passing along the changes proposed by PTI for implementation in the root.
On the other hand, maybe it's not correct to characterize the situation as Seun did - perhaps the idea here is that ICANN will be the policy-maker for root changes.
I must be misunderstanding something, but I'm not sure what --
David
*******************************David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose) http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc. http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: [log in to unmask]The key to understanding is humility - my view !