hi, as requested: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GGHDeu4GptK-QUo7qdBBiVXMzHSEZrR1doEbltmsddU/edit?usp=sharing the conversion put the draft imprint in foreground so they need to be deleted on any page you want to comment. i have deleted some of the. avri On 20-Jun-15 10:14, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > I am marking up with sticky notes, as I do not have edit capability > for PDFs on my laptop. Hope this will be helpful, I will include all > the relevant bits from my dissenting report as I understand that they > have been omitted. A google doc actually might be more helpful here, > or some other kind of pad, if we can convert from the PDF to that > format, as it is 62 pages and it is really important we get our points > in as early as possible. > kind regards, > stephanie perrin > > On 2015-06-17 18:02, Avri Doria wrote: >> hi, >> >> I am just reading this now. >> >> Let me know of anything in the next days. >> >> Just to make sure that people understand this is just a draft of the >> preliminary issues report. that will come next - at which point we can >> submit formal comments. At this point I will just be reviewing it as >> part of the process team. >> >> avri >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: [EWG-Process-WG] Draft Preliminary Issue Report >> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:59:09 -0600 >> From: Lisa Phifer <[log in to unmask]> >> To: [log in to unmask] >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> Attached please find a DRAFT of a new Preliminary Issue Report for your >> review. >> >> As requested, staff has prepared this new draft to replace the original >> Preliminary Issue Report published in March 2013. This new draft: >> >> * incorporates by reference further work and correspondence on this >> topic over the past two years; >> >> * includes overviews of the EWG's outputs and Final Report (Section 3.6) >> and the EP-WG's Process Framework (Section 3.7); >> >> * frames the issue addressed by this PDP to reflect the 26 May 2015 >> Board resolution (Section 3.5) and your framework adopted by that >> resolution; and >> >> * discusses that issue (Section 4) by identifying questions, >> available/needed inputs, and phased outputs, based on the EP-WG's >> Process Framework. >> >> As agreed, this DRAFT is now being sent to EP-WG members to preview the >> Preliminary Issue Report before it is posted for public comment, to >> ensure that your framework (2 April 2015) has been properly reflected. >> >> *Please raise any errors or omissions spotted during your preview of >> this DRAFT to the EP-WG list no later than 26 June.* >> >> Note that staff is also drafting a proposed PDP WG charter in parallel >> with your Issue Report preview. Any edits resulting from this EP-WG >> preview will be folded into the body of the Preliminary Issue Report and >> proposed charter. >> >> We expect to post the Preliminary Issue Report (including proposed >> charter) for public comment following your preview. >> >> In addition, after the public comment period, EP-WG members will have an >> opportunity to review public comments and recommend any needed changes >> to the framework. >> >> Staff (Marika and Margie) are also available in BA next week to discuss >> any questions or concerns. >> >> Best Regards, >> Lisa >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus