At 09:25 PM 8/11/2015, Robin Gross wrote: >Excellent analysis from Brenden on one key flaw in the CCWG >Accountability's existing proposal - how the proposed SOAC "voting >weights" empowers some parts of the ICANN community (ACs) while >disempowering others (including the GNSO) as compared to the >existing balance of power in ICANN's structure. So this is one >gaping hole we need to fix in the draft proposal, which otherwise >has recommended some significant improvements (like the Independent >Review process and Reconsideration Request process). Robin: I'm curious as to whether you mean that the proposal has improvements in the IRP compared to the prior (May) draft, or compared to the status quo (existing IRP)? David >On Aug 11, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote: > >>Dr. Brenden Kuerbis of IGP has developed a very important analysis >>of the CCWG's proposed voting distribution model, which we need to >>take into account when developing our comments. >>Read it here: >><http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/11/ccwg-community-mechanism-threatens-to-upset-icann-balance/#comment-40415>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/11/ccwg-community-mechanism-threatens-to-upset-icann-balance/#comment-40415 >> >>Dr. Milton L. Mueller >>Professor, School of Public Policy >>Georgia Institute of Technology >> >> > ******************************* David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post book (Jefferson's Moose) http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc. http://www.davidpost.com *******************************