At 09:25 PM 8/11/2015, Robin Gross wrote:
>Excellent analysis from Brenden on one key flaw in the CCWG 
>Accountability's existing proposal - how the proposed SOAC "voting 
>weights" empowers some parts of the ICANN community (ACs) while 
>disempowering others (including the GNSO) as compared to the 
>existing balance of power in ICANN's structure.  So this is one 
>gaping hole we need to fix in the draft proposal, which otherwise 
>has recommended some significant improvements (like the Independent 
>Review process and Reconsideration Request process).


Robin:  I'm curious as to whether you mean that the proposal has 
improvements in the IRP compared to the prior (May) draft, or 
compared to the status quo (existing IRP)?
David





>On Aug 11, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
>>Dr. Brenden Kuerbis of IGP has developed a very important analysis 
>>of the CCWG's proposed voting distribution model, which we need to 
>>take into account when developing our comments.
>>Read it here: 
>><http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/11/ccwg-community-mechanism-threatens-to-upset-icann-balance/#comment-40415>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/11/ccwg-community-mechanism-threatens-to-upset-icann-balance/#comment-40415
>>
>>Dr. Milton L. Mueller
>>Professor, School of Public Policy
>>Georgia Institute of Technology
>>
>>
>

*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic  publications 
etc.  http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************