Should not would. My idea not the plan
--
Paul
Sent from myMail app for Android
>I would like to suggest that the single most
>critical aspect that the NCSG could comment on
>(and on which I plan to comment independently)
>is the one that has already been raised on this
>list by Milton that is the ambiguity as to the
>role of governments in the reformed ICANN. My own view is as follows:
>
>1) If they wish, governments could
>participate as all other stakeholders do in the
>new community structure. If they did that,
>however, they would lose the privileged status
>that their advice gets in board consideration. [SNIP]
Paul: can you explain that? Why would
participating in the new community structure mean
that GAC would lose its privileged status?
David
*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose) http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic
publications etc. http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************