Aha ... I misunderstood -
David
At 10:29 AM 8/11/2015, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
Should not would. My idea
not the plan
--
Paul
Sent from myMail app for Android
Tuesday, 11 August 2015, 07:10AM -06:00 from David Post
<[log in to unmask]
>:
- At 10:37 PM 8/10/2015, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
- >I would like to suggest that the single most
- >critical aspect that the NCSG could comment on
- >(and on which I plan to comment independently)
- >is the one that has already been raised on this
- >list by Milton – that is the ambiguity as to the
- >role of governments in the reformed ICANN. My own view is as
follows:
- >
- >1) If they wish, governments could
- >participate as all other stakeholders do in the
- >new community structure. If they did that,
- >however, they would lose the privileged status
- >that their advice gets in board consideration. [SNIP]
- Paul: can you explain that? Why would
- participating in the new community structure mean
- that GAC would lose its privileged status?
- David
- *******************************
- David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America
Foundation
- blog (Volokh Conspiracy)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
- book (Jefferson s Moose)
http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
- music
http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic
- publications etc.
http://www.davidpost.com
- *******************************
*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America
Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose)
http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music
http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc.
http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************