At 09:25 PM 8/11/2015, Robin Gross wrote:
Excellent analysis from Brenden
on one key flaw in the CCWG Accountability's existing proposal - how the
proposed SOAC "voting weights" empowers some parts of the ICANN
community (ACs) while disempowering others (including the GNSO) as
compared to the existing balance of power in ICANN's structure. So
this is one gaping hole we need to fix in the draft proposal, which
otherwise has recommended some significant improvements (like the
Independent Review process and Reconsideration Request process).
Robin: I'm curious as to whether you mean that the proposal has
improvements in the IRP compared to the prior (May) draft, or compared to
the status quo (existing IRP)?
David
On Aug 11, 2015, at 11:20 AM,
Mueller, Milton L wrote:
Dr. Brenden Kuerbis of IGP has
developed a very important analysis of the CCWG’s proposed voting
distribution model, which we need to take into account when developing
our comments.
Read it here:
http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/11/ccwg-community-mechanism-threatens-to-upset-icann-balance/#comment-40415
Dr. Milton L. Mueller
Professor, School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology
*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America
Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose)
http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music
http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc.
http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************