-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 OK. I agree with Kathy that this kind of interpellation should be done first privately, then brought to the list if needed. fraternal regards - --c.a. On 9/22/15 04:39, Joy Liddicoat wrote: > Well said Avri, I agree Thanks Ed for all your work and Milton for > yours, > > > > Joy Liddicoat Sent from my phone > > > >> On 22/09/2015, at 08:15, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> The only thing I would add is that one of the prices we pay for >> 'voting our consciences' in council and elsewhere is sometimes >> being challenged to explain ourselves. >> >> Milton challenged, and Ed responded. >> >> Perhaps it was a bit more acrimonious than it might have been, >> but that may be in NCSG's nature. And perhaps the explanation was >> more detailed than some of us might have written, that may be in >> Ed's nature and a trait we have often benefited from. >> >> The question was posed and the response given. >> >> avri >> >> >>> On 21-Sep-15 15:19, Kathy Kleiman wrote: Hi Milton and All, >>> >>> We all agree that Ed has been a “fantastic contributor to the >>> Noncommercials.” He has devoted thousands of hours to policy >>> discussions and documents, to Independent Review Process work, >>> document requests, GNSO Council preparation and leadership and >>> much more. As with a core of people in the NCSG, he has devoted >>> enormous amounts of his professional and personal time and >>> skills to advancing the interests and concerns of the >>> noncommercial community. Ed has been very successful, and I, >>> for one, am very glad that he has taken lion’s share of many >>> important projects. >>> >>> >>> What we appear to be arguing about here, and strangely on a >>> public list, is whether the CCWG participation and attendance >>> policy makes sense and should be a basis for determining >>> funding for a CCWG in-person meeting. The answer, of course, is >>> no, every community should have equal representation. But >>> that’s not the policy that was adopted and that not the way >>> that slots for a meeting taking place > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWAVDnAAoJEB/lG7Ce6Pjj17gP/2FwL8kPnyTeUzGPZpoArxg/ jBYCmhSFwnMzdIH8ecAn2QGpnAOiTf07wwkneJ3elDvaTTOHasAmeqy5DEGAu1he Dm/GzKQ7gKGd10AHVs1PdrZmrffB1UqL6QJWJ9QAEz0F0SydhTsaH7w6S6J1nAnX aDkBx+CWYlzCukXEVznxlK+p1vRJJFp8Ih4nIXToBU54jOYCxjnAwj/8/nxjR5jU QXTjGi0cphWwgjaZKv/yOaa2+ps3Aztt4vNnBBu5bQt/4r+CMVx3j/SxjGnAX0rU bgur07VKcgmS7MGPOE3QEWvbThT0dhzMJOnC2hP4FfsK+qF/60EZwjnYgoSZ0ny8 PEBFvdbhYPOpWxLYmL2618UaCK5IjdcuLUDIepGho1MYRaw2h99EjjuRXPWtqapf GEriGo7XuCVhyYPUdm8GuFiIRNg5B72y28LJQSxkIZZPVdFIJpSuAyQv5BDGBp+3 X9Q+E5FNb1dpqYiv6rLH5SmB4SRqZFH9t3PV/7BFf0I5cc5nMNOGaOPQWfaNsXgX M3A0dBsOEIqoZy2T2ZfHDX/nFCHWctzFq81b8lPqrRW93UD7TBaNUZ+C3iCKHN00 i8rhyrGJOOVZ6JGAG/LM61pWQpv82SqNqKb9qWJOJDMQleHdjsNmTAQNtVunsWEg 57NOUEsMpt0Cx7JotRVd =uKSa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----