> On Sep 7, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > On 06-Sep-15 11:44, Mueller, Milton L wrote: >> >> By the way, in view of the board’s comments, would an acceptable >> compromise response be to say that we (NCSG) don’t mind giving up >> community approval of budget and strategic plan but keeping all other >> elements of the SMCM? I thought that many of us were not so keen on >> budget and strat plan and viewed it as too micromanaging and/or a way >> for other stakeholders to tie up ICANN. Bit I hadn’t followed that >> but closely so would like to hear from those who did. >> > > that matches my view. Mine as well. Bill