> On Sep 7, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> On 06-Sep-15 11:44, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>> 
>> By the way, in view of the board’s comments, would an acceptable
>> compromise response be to say that we (NCSG) don’t mind giving up
>> community approval of budget and strategic plan but keeping all other
>> elements of the SMCM? I thought that many of us were not so keen on
>> budget and strat plan and viewed it as too micromanaging and/or a way
>> for other stakeholders to tie up ICANN.  Bit I  hadn’t followed that
>> but closely so would like to hear from those who did.
>> 
> 
> that matches my view.

Mine as well.

Bill