On 9/7/2015 7:35 AM, William Drake wrote: > >> On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Tapani Tarvainen >> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> compromise phrasing like "... human rights, in particular >> freedom of expression and privacy" might work. > > Works for me, per the F2F discussions with other stakeholders since > summer 2014. This makes sense and is advisable. I'm not sure it brings us to consensus, but I think it's worth doing anyways. It avoids a fractured ICANN-specific HR framework, while emphasizing the importance of the two rights that are most often threatened in the ICANN context. I'd add due process. Best, Tamir > > Bill