On 9/7/2015 7:35 AM, William Drake wrote:

[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

compromise phrasing like "... human rights, in particular
freedom of expression and privacy" might work.

Works for me, per the F2F discussions with other stakeholders since summer 2014.

This makes sense and is advisable.

I'm not sure it brings us to consensus, but I think it's worth doing anyways. It avoids a fractured ICANN-specific HR framework, while emphasizing the importance of the two rights that are most often threatened in the ICANN context. I'd add due process.

Best,
Tamir

[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

Bill