Thanks Padmini,

Excellent work! This is very useful information.

I note that some of the requests are very broad in nature and would pose a
challenge to comply eg those requests for "All communications from ...","
all documents from..". In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate
reason for denial if the request is too burdensome.

ICANN must provide a reason(s) to support why it denies a request - merely
stating "No" does not engender trust as the decision may not have any
merit. Providing clear reasons would ensure that ICANN is in fact following
the DIDP , it would provide legal guidance for future applicants and would
comfort disappointed applicants who would be better informed on whether to
pursue a re-consideration of the decision.

regards

Karel

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Padmini <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear all
>
> Please find two links, which contain a comprehensive breakdown of all the
> DIDP requests ever filed and responded to by ICANN as of today.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M1gWBpa7tlxGPMWyB6xJryddahyZzjVIarSz0RJswDM/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x1vG23FdIAzo4ro80eEieaokBpAeNVtYXjds6mHt2DE/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Please read the two together. Since this was a massive manual data
> compiling project, I may have inadvertently made some small errors; in the
> event that you do find any, please leave a comment, and I will follow it
> up. Hope this comes of use.
>
> Warm regards
>
> Padmini Baruah
> Programme Associate, Internet Governance
> Center for Internet and Society, Bangalore
>
>