Thanks Padmini, Excellent work! This is very useful information. I note that some of the requests are very broad in nature and would pose a challenge to comply eg those requests for "All communications from ..."," all documents from..". In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate reason for denial if the request is too burdensome. ICANN must provide a reason(s) to support why it denies a request - merely stating "No" does not engender trust as the decision may not have any merit. Providing clear reasons would ensure that ICANN is in fact following the DIDP , it would provide legal guidance for future applicants and would comfort disappointed applicants who would be better informed on whether to pursue a re-consideration of the decision. regards Karel On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Padmini <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear all > > Please find two links, which contain a comprehensive breakdown of all the > DIDP requests ever filed and responded to by ICANN as of today. > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M1gWBpa7tlxGPMWyB6xJryddahyZzjVIarSz0RJswDM/edit?usp=sharing > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x1vG23FdIAzo4ro80eEieaokBpAeNVtYXjds6mHt2DE/edit?usp=sharing > > Please read the two together. Since this was a massive manual data > compiling project, I may have inadvertently made some small errors; in the > event that you do find any, please leave a comment, and I will follow it > up. Hope this comes of use. > > Warm regards > > Padmini Baruah > Programme Associate, Internet Governance > Center for Internet and Society, Bangalore > >