+1 on the work done. Will be good to know if reasons where provided for the
NO as I expect it won't be an outright "no"

Regards
Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 6 Oct 2015 14:49, "Karel Douglas" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks Padmini,
>
> Excellent work! This is very useful information.
>
> I note that some of the requests are very broad in nature and would pose a
> challenge to comply eg those requests for "All communications from ...","
> all documents from..". In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate
> reason for denial if the request is too burdensome.
>
> ICANN must provide a reason(s) to support why it denies a request - merely
> stating "No" does not engender trust as the decision may not have any
> merit. Providing clear reasons would ensure that ICANN is in fact following
> the DIDP , it would provide legal guidance for future applicants and would
> comfort disappointed applicants who would be better informed on whether to
> pursue a re-consideration of the decision.
>
> regards
>
> Karel
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Padmini <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> Please find two links, which contain a comprehensive breakdown of all the
>> DIDP requests ever filed and responded to by ICANN as of today.
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M1gWBpa7tlxGPMWyB6xJryddahyZzjVIarSz0RJswDM/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x1vG23FdIAzo4ro80eEieaokBpAeNVtYXjds6mHt2DE/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Please read the two together. Since this was a massive manual data
>> compiling project, I may have inadvertently made some small errors; in the
>> event that you do find any, please leave a comment, and I will follow it
>> up. Hope this comes of use.
>>
>> Warm regards
>>
>> Padmini Baruah
>> Programme Associate, Internet Governance
>> Center for Internet and Society, Bangalore
>>
>>
>