+1 on the work done. Will be good to know if reasons where provided for the NO as I expect it won't be an outright "no" Regards Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 6 Oct 2015 14:49, "Karel Douglas" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Thanks Padmini, > > Excellent work! This is very useful information. > > I note that some of the requests are very broad in nature and would pose a > challenge to comply eg those requests for "All communications from ..."," > all documents from..". In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate > reason for denial if the request is too burdensome. > > ICANN must provide a reason(s) to support why it denies a request - merely > stating "No" does not engender trust as the decision may not have any > merit. Providing clear reasons would ensure that ICANN is in fact following > the DIDP , it would provide legal guidance for future applicants and would > comfort disappointed applicants who would be better informed on whether to > pursue a re-consideration of the decision. > > regards > > Karel > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Padmini <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Dear all >> >> Please find two links, which contain a comprehensive breakdown of all the >> DIDP requests ever filed and responded to by ICANN as of today. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M1gWBpa7tlxGPMWyB6xJryddahyZzjVIarSz0RJswDM/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x1vG23FdIAzo4ro80eEieaokBpAeNVtYXjds6mHt2DE/edit?usp=sharing >> >> Please read the two together. Since this was a massive manual data >> compiling project, I may have inadvertently made some small errors; in the >> event that you do find any, please leave a comment, and I will follow it >> up. Hope this comes of use. >> >> Warm regards >> >> Padmini Baruah >> Programme Associate, Internet Governance >> Center for Internet and Society, Bangalore >> >> >