All, A flash of ICANN Board sanity here. Great! If my memory serves me right, there may be a second related step necessary on the insurance front. I believe it is correct to say that ICANN also imposes an insurance requirement on contracts between Registrars and Registries. Correct me if I am wrong but as I recall, African Registries have also complained that the nature of the insurance condition, as written in the contracts, is also very burdensome. Am I right...or wrong? Sam L. On 01/10/2015 11:33 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote: > > Hi, > > Related to the discussion about developing economies and gTLD, ICANN > board just voted this resolution waiving the registrar insurance > requirement which represents a barrier in many developing countries > https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-waives-registrar-insurance-requirement-levels-playing-field-for-registrars-globally > > Rafik >