I agree wholeheartedly :) On 06/10/2015 12:20 PM, Tamir Israel wrote: > Yes, but even in Canada, this tool is sometimes [mis]-used to force > people to narrow their requests unnecessarily. > > I don't think it's unreasonable to go one step further and make ICANN > shoulder a high degree of the cost here unless it becomes truly > unreasonable, in which case tailoring the request or offering to let the > requestor pay should be the remedy. They get all these revenues from > DNS, may as well put them to good use. > > Best, > Tamir > > On 10/6/2015 12:03 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote: >> In Canada, when it is, you just have to pay the extra work load and/or >> material to get it, and they offer you to refine your search instead >> and work with you on your request. There is no way that a no is >> acceptable. >> >> Big item for transparency and accountability IMO. >> >> Nicolas >> >> >> On 06/10/2015 9:47 AM, Karel Douglas wrote: >>> In some jurisdictions this can be a legitimate reason for denial if >>> the request is too burdensome. >