Thank you Avri for everything you have done. Words cannot say enough. -James On 26/10/2015, 10:41 a.m., "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Avri Doria" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote: >Hi, > >As these were passed as part of my last meeting as a council member, I >will do my last council list forward as part of my duties as a member of >council from NCSG. > >It was my honor to serve, and I wish Stefania who is now holding that >seat, the best. I also give my best regards to the renewed and incumbent >members. Have a great year. > >thanks for the opportunity to serve as an NCSG representative on the >council, > >avri > > >-------- Forwarded Message -------- >Subject: [council] GNSO Council Resolutions October 2015 >Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:04:00 +0000 >From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]> >To: GNSO Council List ([log in to unmask]) <[log in to unmask]> > > > >Dear Councillors, > >Please find the resolutions passed at the GNSO Council meeting today, >Wednesday 21 October 2015. > >*1. Approval of the Data & Metrics Working Group Recommendations (non-PDP)* > >WHEREAS > >On 17 October 2012 the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on metrics >and reporting (see >http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/uofr-final-31mar13-en.pdf). > >On 16 May 2013 the GNSO Council deliberated a recommendation on the >Uniformity of Reporting from the Registration Abuse Policies Working >Group (RAPWG) and approved a non-PDP Working Group to consider metrics >and reporting: > >“The GNSO Council further approves the creation of a drafting team to >develop a charter for a non-PDP Working Group to consider additional >methods for collecting necessary metrics and reporting from Contracted >Parties and other external resources to aid the investigation.” >(http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20130516-1). > >On 23 Jan 2014 the GNSO Council approved the charter for a Data and >Metrics for Policy Making Working Group (DMPM WG) (see >http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20140123-1). > >The Data and Metrics for Policy Making WG (DMPM WG) deliberated the >issues as defined in its charter and published an Initial Report for >public comment on 29 July 2015 for the required 40 day period (see >https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29-en ><mhtml:file://C:%5CUsers%5CGlen%5CDocuments%5CMotions+21+October+2015.mht%21https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29-en>). > >The DMPM WG reviewed the input received (see public comment review tool) >and updated its report accordingly. > >On 9 October 2015 the DMPM WG submitted its Final Report ><http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/dmpm-final-09oct15-en.pdf> to the GNSO >Council. > >RESOLVED, > >The GNSO Council adopts all the consensus recommendations in the Final >Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/dmpm-final-09oct15-en.pdf> and >instructs ICANN staff to begin implementation of the seven recommendations. > >The GNSO Council thanks the DMPM WG for its efforts and recommends that >the WG be formally closed as a result of the adoption by the GNSO >Council of the WG’s recommendations. > >The WG nevertheless requests that the WG remain available to provide >input to the GNSO Council and ICANN staff should any questions or issues >arise in relation to implementation of its recommendations prior to the >formation of an Implementation Review Team. > >The GNSO Council requests ICANN staff to prepare an evaluation report >for the GNSO Council shortly after the conclusion of implementation of >this pilot effort. > >*2. Process and Participation in CCWG-Accountability* > >Whereas > >On 13 November 2014 the GNSO approved the charter for a Cross Community >Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability); > >On 3 August the Public Comment on the CCWG-Accountability 2ndDraft >Proposal was initiated, which ended on 12 September 2015; > >The CCWG-Accountability has analyzed the comments received in the review >of the 2nd draft and is working toward updating its reference >implementation taking into account the concerns expressed in those comments; > >and The CCWG-Accountability is working in a considered and collegial >manner to achieve a consensus solution to ICANN Accountability; > >Acknowledging > >the superb and continuing leadership of CCWG-Accountability by the team >which includes the GNSO appointed co-chair Thomas Rickert, to whom we >are grateful for his time and consistent effort; > >Resolved > >The GNSO reiterates its support for the process that is ongoing in >CCWG-Accountability, > >its commitment to participating in continuing discussions with the goal >of finding solutions with broad agreement for ICANN accountability in >preparation for IANA transition, and > >to working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before >declaring support or opposition to possible outcomes. > >Please let me know if you have any questions. >Thank you. > >Kind regards, > >Glen > > > >Glen de Saint Géry >GNSO Secretariat >*[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>* >*http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>* > > > > > > >--- >This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >https://www.avast.com/antivirus