All,
Mea Culpa.
I cleared up my own confusion here. This IS about a registrar
insurance waiver
Foggy brain is a hazard from staying up all night working
to meet a deadline.
Sam L.
On 01/10/2015 11:44 AM, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">All,
A flash of ICANN Board sanity here. Great! If my memory serves
me right, there may be a second related step necessary on the
insurance front. I believe it is correct to say that ICANN also
imposes an insurance requirement on contracts between Registrars
and Registries. Correct me if I am wrong but as I recall,
African Registries have also complained that the nature of the
insurance condition, as written in the contracts, is also very
burdensome.
Am I right...or wrong?
Sam L.
On 01/10/2015 11:33 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
Hi,
Related to the discussion about developing economies and gTLD,
ICANN board just voted this resolution waiving the registrar
insurance requirement which represents a barrier in many
developing countries
https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-waives-registrar-insurance-requirement-levels-playing-field-for-registrars-globally
Rafik
--
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: [log in to unmask] Skype: slanfranco
blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852