+1, it is useful information 06.10.15 21:59, Seun Ojedeji пишет: > +1 on the work done. Will be good to know if reasons where provided for > the NO as I expect it won't be an outright "no" > > Regards > Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 > Kindly excuse brevity and typos. > > On 6 Oct 2015 14:49, "Karel Douglas" <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > Thanks Padmini, > > Excellent work! This is very useful information. > > I note that some of the requests are very broad in nature and would > pose a challenge to comply eg those requests for "All communications > from ..."," all documents from..". In some jurisdictions this can be > a legitimate reason for denial if the request is too burdensome. > > ICANN must provide a reason(s) to support why it denies a request - > merely stating "No" does not engender trust as the decision may not > have any merit. Providing clear reasons would ensure that ICANN is > in fact following the DIDP , it would provide legal guidance for > future applicants and would comfort disappointed applicants > who would be better informed on whether to pursue a re-consideration > of the decision. > > regards > > Karel > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Padmini <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > Dear all > > Please find two links, which contain a comprehensive breakdown > of all the DIDP requests ever filed and responded to by ICANN as > of today. > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M1gWBpa7tlxGPMWyB6xJryddahyZzjVIarSz0RJswDM/edit?usp=sharing > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x1vG23FdIAzo4ro80eEieaokBpAeNVtYXjds6mHt2DE/edit?usp=sharing > > Please read the two together. Since this was a massive manual > data compiling project, I may have inadvertently made some small > errors; in the event that you do find any, please leave a > comment, and I will follow it up. Hope this comes of use. > > Warm regards > > Padmini Baruah > Programme Associate, Internet Governance > Center for Internet and Society, Bangalore > >