Avri has raised the question of whether or not NCSG should be concerned with the names and resolving protocols questions raised in the following IETF document:

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-00.txt

Having read the document here is my small contribution. There may be some issues in the questions raised that might become of interest to NCSG but given the nature of the issue – reserve names linked to other (non-DNS) resolution protocols- my advice is to leave it up to the IETF to ruminate over the issues and, at the appropriate times, that may toss up issues for NCSG to consider. It does not look like an area where NCSG mining documents for NCSG-centric issues would be productive.

Sam L. (NPOC)

[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-00.txt

i know the council is not interested in such things, but thought maybe
the NCSG is.

avri