Bruce, according to the CCWG charter, any determination by the board that a CCWG recommendation is “not in the public interest” requires a 2/3 majority of the board. Your comments contain 2 or 3 items which the board deems not in the “public interest.” Yet, as far as I can tell, no record of a vote is available. In order to verify that the board has actually passed its threshold, please provide a tally of the voting board members on each of those 3 items: 1. Inspection rights 2. Mission statement 3. Human rights Thanks, --MM From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 5:49 AM To: Accountability Cross Community Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations Hello Jordan, Thanks for posting to the list. The comments are also available in the public comment forum at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00011.html We had a half day meeting of the full Board on Thursday 10 Dec, and then spent a few hours again with the full Board finalizing the comments yesterday – Sunday 13 Dec. That was in addition to another half day meeting held on Saturday 5 Dec. All dates are relative to my time zone ☺ Regards, Bruce Tonkin