Registered as a member. Looking forward. On 19 Jan 2016 21:30, "Marilia Maciel" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Completely agree with the suggestion of a webinar! When would be a good > timing? I also joined this one as an observer. > M > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Zalnieriute, Monika < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi Stephanie, >> >> >> indeed a webinar on the issues regarding WHOIS and its update would be >> great! >> >> >> Looking forward! >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> Monika >> >> >> ---- >> >> Dr. Monika Zalnieriute >> >> C I H R : Centre for Internet & Human Rights I >> a: Mittelweg 50, 12053 Berlin, Germany I >> e: [log in to unmask] I >> p: +37062852809 | >> w: cihr.eu I >> >> Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I >> a: Vilnius Str. 14 - 7, LT – 01402, Vilnius, Lithuania | >> f: www.facebook.com/zephiroplatform | >> w: zephiroplatform.wix.com/main | >> e: [log in to unmask] | >> p: +37062852809 | >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Ayden >> Fabien Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2016 1:12 AM >> >> *To:* [log in to unmask] >> *Subject:* Re: Privacy and WHOIS update >> >> Thanks for writing back, Rafik. If I can collaborate in any way with this >> project as it moves forward, please do consider reaching out to me. Would >> be great to learn from NCUC veterans. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Ayden >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ayden, >>> >>> I can respond to this. Bill talked about project of ebook for NCUC . we >>> don't have that yet as draft but definitely a working item for this year . >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> 2016-01-19 9:58 GMT+09:00 Ayden Fabien Férdeline <[log in to unmask]>: >>> >>>> Hi Stephanie, >>>> >>>> Just to add support to your comment, I would find any webinar that >>>> shares some institutional memory of the NCSG most useful and would be sure >>>> to participate were it to be arranged. >>>> >>>> I remember it being mentioned (perhaps by Bill Drake? but correct me if >>>> I am mistaken) at ICANN 54 that there was an e-book being compiled that >>>> contained some of the community's shared positions on a number of topics so >>>> that those new to or outside of the NCUC/NCSG community would know what we >>>> stood for. Do you know where we are at with this? Even if this is only in >>>> draft form I would find such a resource very helpful. >>>> >>>> Thanks again for all that you do. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Ayden Férdeline >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:18 AM, James Gannon <[log in to unmask]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well its all been divided up on the basis of the EPWG 3 stage PDP >>>>> design so I don’t see how it could be divided up even further, and the >>>>> structure seems quite linear in design. >>>>> For the record Im also on as a member. >>>>> >>>>> -jg >>>>> >>>>> From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of >>>>> Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> Reply-To: Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> Date: Monday 18 January 2016 at 3:16 p.m. >>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: Privacy and WHOIS update >>>>> >>>>> Great news, we are assembling quite a team. Take a look at how many >>>>> public safety folks from the GAC have signed up....we need a big team! >>>>> We will be organizing a list for just NCSG folks, and a skype channel >>>>> to use during meetings, to keep us coordinated. This is going to be a very >>>>> big pdp, I expect to see calls to divide it up...do folks have thoughts on >>>>> that? I view it as dangerous. >>>>> Kind regards Stephanie >>>>> >>>>> On 16-01-18 2:54 AM, Joy Liddicoat wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Stephanie – I have also joined as an individual. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Joy Liddicoat >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask] >>>>> <[log in to unmask]>] *On Behalf Of *Poomjit >>>>> Sirawongprasert >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 15 January 2016 2:04 a.m. >>>>> *To:* [log in to unmask] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: Privacy and WHOIS update >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Stephanie, >>>>> >>>>> Could you please add me into the observer list? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Moui >>>>> >>>>> Sent via Mobile >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 10, 2016 4:38 AM, "Stephanie Perrin" < >>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is just a quick note to update list members on what is going on >>>>> at ICANN related to privacy and protection of registration data. The most >>>>> important development which I need to bring to your attention is the call >>>>> for volunteers for the new pdp to develop a replacement for the WHOIS >>>>> directory. I have copied the call at the bottom of this email. Please >>>>> consider joining, either as an observer or full participant. If you have >>>>> questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, Tapani Tarvainen, or Kathy >>>>> Kleiman (in cc). We really need a great many people to volunteer for this >>>>> work, as it is extremely important, and there are many commercial >>>>> participants already signed up. It is important to have balanced >>>>> representation of interests on these working groups. >>>>> >>>>> Registrars and technical experts have expressed concern, notably at >>>>> the GNSO level, about the RDAP (registration data access protocol) work >>>>> that is proceeding even though the work of the PDP on WHOIS replacement may >>>>> make this work irrelevant. It is likely a call to put the brakes on that >>>>> work may develop. For more information on the RDAP implementation, look >>>>> here:https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdap-profile-2015-12-03-en. >>>>> We will be putting in comments, due in 22 days. >>>>> >>>>> The call for volunteers for the Competition and Consumer Trust Review >>>>> Team has resulted in the selection of the team, listed here: >>>>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-12-23-en. This is a >>>>> very important review, and members may be interested in following the work >>>>> of this team. Further information is available here >>>>> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/cct and members may be >>>>> interested in looking at the public opinion survey done by Nielsen in 2015, >>>>> as it will no doubt be important for the work of the committee, and be >>>>> considered in the context of the the two studies of DNS abuse for which >>>>> ICANN is currently tendering. >>>>> >>>>> The Final report and recommendations of the Privacy Proxy Working >>>>> Group has been sent to the GNSO for its endorsement, and will be discussed >>>>> at the Marrakech meeting in March. We expect to see a call for volunteers >>>>> for the implementation working group shortly. >>>>> >>>>> Finally, we are proposing to have a privacy meeting in Marrakech, >>>>> although we have yet to hear whether this proposal has been approved. Stay >>>>> tuned, and please join us for the next monthly discussion on January 19th. >>>>> >>>>> Stephanie Perrin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcements >>>>> Call for Volunteers: New GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) Working >>>>> Group to Establish a Policy Framework for a Next-Generation gTLD >>>>> Registration Directory Service to Replace WHOIS (Next-Gen RDS) How to >>>>> Join >>>>> >>>>> If you are interested in joining the WG as an individual participant >>>>> or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form >>>>> <http://goo.gl/forms/bb65iIznLv> or send the Word document >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gnso-pdp-next-gen-rds-wg-sign-up-04jan16-en.docx> >>>>> [DOCX, 72 KB] filled in to the GNSO Secretariat <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> >>>>> All members and observers will be listed on the PDP WG's wiki page. >>>>> In Brief >>>>> >>>>> The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council seeks >>>>> volunteers to serve on a PDP Working Group to establish a policy framework >>>>> for a next-generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace >>>>> WHOIS (Next-Gen RDS). The GNSO Council approved the WG's charter >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201511> on 19 November >>>>> 2015, tasking this PDP to address concerns with WHOIS by creating a new >>>>> policy framework capable of balancing diverse interests to meet today's >>>>> needs for gTLD registration data. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *What This Team Will Do* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The PDP WG will use a 3-phase process defined in the approved charter >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf>to >>>>> (1) establish gTLD registration data requirements to determine if and why a >>>>> next-generation RDS is needed, (2) design policies that detail functions >>>>> that must be provided by a next-generation RDS to support those >>>>> requirements, and (3) provide guidance for how a next-generation RDS should >>>>> implement those policies, coexisting with and eventually replacing WHOIS. >>>>> >>>>> This PDP WG will provide the GNSO Council with policy recommendations >>>>> regarding the issues identified in the Final Issue Report >>>>> <https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/final-issue-report-next-generation-rds-07oct15-en.pdf> >>>>> [PDF, 1.4 MB] and as defined in the charter approved by the GNSO >>>>> Council >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf> >>>>> [PDF, 628 KB]. Specifically, this PDP WG is tasked with analyzing the >>>>> purpose of collecting, maintaining and providing access to gTLD >>>>> registration data and considering safeguards for protecting that data, >>>>> determining if and why a next-generation RDS is needed to replace WHOIS, >>>>> and creating policies and coexistence and implementation guidance to meet >>>>> those needs. >>>>> >>>>> During the first phase of this PDP, the PDP WG will, at a minimum, >>>>> attempt to reach consensus recommendations regarding the questions detailed >>>>> in the PDP WG’s charter. The PDP WG’s output will then be submitted to >>>>> the GNSO Council for approval of its recommendations regarding IF and WHY a >>>>> next-generation RDS is needed to replace WHOIS before moving to the next >>>>> phase. If the WG concludes a new policy framework is needed, this output >>>>> should include requirements to be addressed by that new framework and any >>>>> next-generation RDS. However, if the WG concludes the existing WHOIS system >>>>> can adequately address requirements, the WG’s output should confirm this >>>>> and identify any necessary changes to the WHOIS policy framework. >>>>> >>>>> After Phase 1, if the GNSO Council confirms that a new policy >>>>> framework and next-generation RDS are required, the PDP WG will then >>>>> proceed to Phases 2 and 3, recommending a new consensus policy framework to >>>>> satisfy requirements for a next-generation RDS established in Phase 1, >>>>> along with any necessary coexistence and implementation guidance. Further >>>>> detail regarding this 3-phase process and questions to be considered can be >>>>> found in the PDP WG’s charter. >>>>> >>>>> *How This Team Will Work* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ICANN WGs use transparent, open processes. The meetings of this PDP WG >>>>> will be recorded, and the recordings will be available to the public. The >>>>> mailing list for the PDP WG will be archived publicly. The group will >>>>> collaborate using a public workspace for draft materials and all final work >>>>> products and milestones will be documented on the WG's wiki >>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Next-Generation+gTLD+Registration+Directory+Services+to+Replace+Whois>. >>>>> The PDP WG is expected to follow the GNSO Working Group Guidelines >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf> >>>>> [PDF, 350 KB] as well as the GNSO PDP Manual. >>>>> >>>>> *How to participate * >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There are two ways to volunteer: >>>>> >>>>> Individual Members – anyone interested cann volunteer to join the PDP >>>>> WG as a WG member, regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN >>>>> community. Members are expected to actively contribute to mailing list >>>>> conversations as well as meetings – it is anticipated tthat the PDP WG will >>>>> at a minimum meet on a weekly basis via teleconference. Members are >>>>> expected to provide essential input to the process. Members will be >>>>> required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI >>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/New+SOIs>). >>>>> >>>>> Mailing list observers – for those who are merely interested in >>>>> monitoring thhe WG’s conversations, there is the possibility to sign up >>>>> as a mailing list "observer" which offers read-only access to the mailing >>>>> list. Mailing list observers will not be permitted to post, will not >>>>> receive invitations to the various meetings or calls of the WG and will not >>>>> have to complete a Statement of Interest. At any point in time, a mailing >>>>> list observer can join the WG as a member simply by informing the GNSO >>>>> Secretariat. >>>>> >>>>> In addition, there will be opportunities to provide input through >>>>> public consultations and public comment processes that the PDP WG is >>>>> expected to organize. >>>>> >>>>> *How to Join* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you are interested in joining the WG as an individual participant >>>>> or mailing list observer, please fill in the sign up form >>>>> <http://goo.gl/forms/bb65iIznLv> or send the Word document >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gnso-pdp-next-gen-rds-wg-sign-up-04jan16-en.docx> >>>>> [DOCX, 72 KB] filled in to the GNSO Secretariat <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> >>>>> All members and observers will be listed on the PDP WG's wiki page. >>>>> >>>>> *Next steps* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In its motion, the GNSO Council directed that this call for volunteers >>>>> be circulated as widely as possible in order to ensure broad representation >>>>> and participation in the WG. This call will remain open until the WG >>>>> convenes for the first time. At this juncture, it is anticipated that the >>>>> PDP WG may convene online in late January 2015. Following that, regular >>>>> online meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the PDP WG’s work >>>>> plan, which it is expected to develop as one of its first tasks. >>>>> >>>>> *Further information and preparation* >>>>> >>>>> For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are strongly >>>>> encouraged to review the following materials prior to the first meeting of >>>>> the PDP WG: >>>>> >>>>> The Final Issue Report >>>>> <https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/final-issue-report-next-generation-rds-07oct15-en.pdf> >>>>> >>>>> The approved charter >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/whois-ng-gtld-rds-charter-07oct15-en.pdf> >>>>> >>>>> Materials available at the PDP WG's wiki >>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Next-Generation+gTLD+Registration+Directory+Services+to+Replace+Whois> >>>>> such as the EWG Final Report and other relevant information. >>>>> Background >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Created in the 1980s, WHOIS began as a service to identify and contact >>>>> entities responsible for the operation of a network resource on the >>>>> Internet. Over the years, ICANN's requirements for gTLD domain name >>>>> registration data collection, access and accuracy have undergone some >>>>> important changes. Yet, after nearly 15 years of task forces, review teams, >>>>> and studies, comprehensive WHOIS policy reform remains the source of >>>>> long-running discussion and debate. >>>>> >>>>> In 2012, the ICANN Board launched the Expert Working Group on gTLD >>>>> Registration Directory Services (EWG) to help redefine the purpose of gTLD >>>>> registration data and consider how to safeguard the data, and to propose a >>>>> model for gTLD registration directory services (RDS) to address accuracy, >>>>> privacy, and access issues. >>>>> >>>>> Upon publication of the EWG's Final Report in June, 2014, an informal >>>>> group of GNSO Councilors and ICANN Board Members collaborated to propose a >>>>> Process Framework for structuring a GNSO PDP to successfully address these >>>>> challenging issues. This Process Framework was adopted by the Board in >>>>> 2015, along with a reaffirmation of its 2012 request for a PDP to be >>>>> convened to define the purpose of collecting, maintaining and providing >>>>> access to gTLD registration data. The Board also asked that the PDP >>>>> consider safeguards for protecting data, using the recommendations in the >>>>> EWG's Final Report as an input to, and, if appropriate, as the foundation >>>>> for a new gTLD policy. >>>>> >>>>> In preparation for this PDP, a new Preliminary Issue Report >>>>> <http://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/rds-prelim-issue-13jul15-en.pdf> >>>>> [PDF, 1.4 MB] was published for public comment >>>>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rds-prelim-issue-2015-07-13-en> >>>>> on 13 July 2015. A Final Issue Report >>>>> <https://whois.icann.org/sites/default/files/files/final-issue-report-next-generation-rds-07oct15-en.pdf> >>>>> [PDF, 1.2 MB] was subsequently published on 7 October 2015, including links >>>>> to all public comments received, along with a draft charter for the PDP WG. >>>>> This draft charter was approved by the GNSO Council on 19 November >>>>> 2015 >>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+19+November+2015>, >>>>> enabling the formation of a GNSO working group of community volunteers to >>>>> progress this PDP. >>>>> >>>>> More information can be found on the GNSO PDP on Next-Generation gTLD >>>>> Registration Directory Service (RDS) page >>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/rds> and the WG's >>>>> wiki >>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Next-Generation+gTLD+Registration+Directory+Services+to+Replace+Whois>, >>>>> including the WG's charter, inputs already provided by all SG/Cs during the >>>>> public comment period, and an extensive library of foundational materials >>>>> to inform the WG's deliberations. In addition, the WG will reach out to all >>>>> SG/Cs for feedback on any items that they believe should be considered that >>>>> may not have been specifically called out in the approved charter. >>>>> >>>>> As this will be a complex multi-phase PDP, all those interested in >>>>> helping to shape the policy framework for a next-generation gTLD RDS are >>>>> encouraged to volunteer for this WG. Only with the help of the entire >>>>> community can this WG achieve its goal of formally defining an appropriate >>>>> purpose of gTLD registration data and establishing a new policy framework >>>>> to enable permissible access to that data with improved privacy and >>>>> accuracy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ayden Férdeline >>>> +44.77.8018.7421 >>>> >>> >>> >> >> Ayden Férdeline >> +44.77.8018.7421 >> >> >> >> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, >> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this >> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is >> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received >> this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the >> material from any computer. >> > > > > -- > *Marília Maciel* > Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio > Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law > School > http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts > > DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu > PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ > Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - > http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en > >