For
example, I want them to justify their action in the CCWG
last week where they ignored our timeline, process,
Charter and pretty much every procedural nicety to put
us in crisis mode and threaten the transition.
MM:
Your outrage is justified but what they did is history
and nothing productive will come out of us waving our
fingers at them over this.
If
Markus is there I want him to justify, as our appointee,
siding with the Board on all votes that this mess
created last Tuesday and point blank ask him why we
should reappoint someone so out of touch with the NCSG
(with one exception).
MM:
This might actually be useful. But there normally are
quieter, more private meetings between us and our
GNSO-appointed board members at a breakfast. Will that
be happening again this meeting? I would like to get
Markus and Bruce in a room and ask them what the hell
was going on in the board during the CCWG process.
I
guess we could label that as questions bout the Board's
relations with the CCWG and intent regarding the
transition.
I'd
be interested in their response to questions about
retainment of The Analysis Group and why the bottom up
process seems to be under threat by ICANN retaining more
and more "experts".
I
guess that's two topics.
From:
"Tapani Tarvainen" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Questions to the Board?
Dear
all,
One regular event at ICANN meetings is that we get to
meet the Board,
talk with them about and ask them whatever we want.
The Board would, however, like to know in advance what
we're going
to ask them, so they could better prepare for it.
If you have suggestions for topics for our meeting with
the Board in
Marrakech, please let me know as soon as possible (feel
free to post
to the list or me directly, as you prefer).
Thank you,
--
Tapani Tarvainen