On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I can't argue with the fact that ICANN's scope at the moment is narrower > and is supposed to limit it to the technical matter of naming and > numbering, but > This was Fadi's whole rationale for NMI - and ICANN's support of it - that there should be a multistakeholder forum for non-ICANN issues, to prevent mission creep. Or at least that's my understanding. Why NMI and not IGF, well.. j -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -------------------------------------------------------------- -