On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> I can't argue with the fact that ICANN's scope at the moment is narrower
> and is supposed to limit it to the technical matter of naming and
> numbering, but
>

​This was Fadi's whole rationale for NMI - and ICANN's support of it - that
there should be a multistakeholder forum for non​-ICANN issues, to prevent
mission creep. Or at least that's my understanding. Why NMI and not IGF,
well..

j



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
--------------------------------------------------------------
-