On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I can't argue with the fact that ICANN's scope at the moment is narrower and is supposed to limit it to the technical matter of naming and numbering, but
This was Fadi's whole rationale for NMI - and ICANN's support of it - that there should be a multistakeholder forum for non-ICANN issues, to prevent mission creep. Or at least that's my understanding. Why NMI and not IGF, well..