On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I can't argue with the fact that ICANN's scope at the moment is narrower and is supposed to limit it to the technical matter of naming and numbering, but

​This was Fadi's whole rationale for NMI - and ICANN's support of it - that there should be a multistakeholder forum for non​-ICANN issues, to prevent mission creep. Or at least that's my understanding. Why NMI and not IGF, well..

j



--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
--------------------------------------------------------------
-