Dear Tapani, does this mean that the team of WS1 has nominated itself to automatically continue to be the formal vehicle for WS2? With the same gourd of members/participants? Is the CNSG going to discuss this at some point? Thanks Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) Forwarded message: > From: Mathieu Weill <[log in to unmask]> > To: CCWG Accountability <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for > CCWG Accountability > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 11:15:16 +0100 (CET) > > FYI, this letter was sent in accordance with our discussions on > Friday. > > > > Best > > Mathieu > > > > De : Mathieu Weill [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Envoyé : dimanche 6 mars 2016 10:15 > À : 'James M. Bladel'; 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Alan Greenberg'; 'Byron > Holland'; 'Patrik Fältström'; 'Louie Lee'; [log in to unmask] > Cc : 'Lise Fuhr'; 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía'; > 'Thomas Rickert'; 'Mathieu Weill'; 'Theresa Swinehart'; 'Fadi > Chehade'; > 'Steve Crocker'; 'Tom Dale'; 'ACCT-Staff'; 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; > 'Bart > Boswinkel'; 'Olof Nordling'; 'David Olive'; > [log in to unmask]; 'Carlos Reyes'; 'Julia Charvolen'; > 'Kimberly Carlson'; 'Julie Hedlund' > Objet : Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for CCWG Accountability > > > > Dear Chartering Organizations, > > > > Since sending you our Work Stream 1 report on 23 February, we have > started > discussions around Work Stream 1 implementation oversight and scoping > for > Work Stream 2. In fact, this was the particular focus of our > Face-to-Face > meeting on Friday, 4 March, and will also be the focus of our working > session on Thursday morning. > > > > Implementation oversight role is not specifically detailed in our > Charter, > but it is the CCWG-Accountabilitys view that the groups role in > implementation is to ensure that the implementation is consistent with > the > Work Stream 1 report, and furthermore to provide input on the > implementation work when required by staff working on the > implementation, > or, if, and when necessary to bring the work back in line with the > intent > of the Work Stream 1 report. > > > > Since we expect the CCWG-Accountability to continue in its current > form to > work through Work Stream 2, the most logical option is to have the > working > group continue in its current form and with the responsibility to > monitor > the implementation and provide input where needed. Of course, this > responsibility would include regular updates to the Chartering > Organizations via the appointed members as well as consultations with > the > Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are deemed > without this specific remit. > > > > We note that, as an example of precedence, while the CWG-Stewardship > Final > Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the CWG-Stewardship has remained > active and therefore available when needed to answer questions from > the > ICG, or to monitor the CCWG-Accountability dependencies, and to > coordinate > with the other operational communities on shared issues such as IANA > intellectual property rights. > > > > As the CCWG-Accountability Charter does not specifically address > implementation, we would like to ensure that the > CCWG-Accountabilitys > proposed approach in relation to implementation is not inconsistent > with > the intent of the Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and > role > of the CCWG-Accountability. We therefore propose to proceed to oversee > the > implementation work as described above unless there are objections > from > one or more Chartering Organizations. > > > > We would like to emphasize that the CCWG-Accountability will remain > open > to anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed individuals > with relevant implementation and operational experience to join the > CCWG-Accountability in this next phase. We will put out a call for > volunteers as we frame Work Stream 2 areas. Finally, we are conscious > of > the heavy workload the CCWG-Accountability has been for your appointed > members, and we would like to offer that Chartering Organizations use > this > interim phase to re-confirm member participation, and appoint new > replacement members if necessary. > > > > Thank you for your consideration, > > > > Leon Sanchez, Thomas Rickert, and Mathieu Weill > > CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list > [log in to unmask] > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community