Good thought Desiree. Others?
On Friday, 18 March 2016, Desiree Miloshevic <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I endorsed IAB statement since we may all end up there in the end.
While the IAB suggests differentiated access regarding data exposure, I do find that
google's comment too is worth supporting, e.g. not to offer public access to the data.
>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf
The overarching principle is minimisation, and to set aside the RDAP and let registries/registrars
deploy them on experimental basis and let the Next Gen PDP WG develop the rest.
So perhaps a little bit more nuances before just endorsing (differentiated) access to the data immediately?
Others may have spent more time on this issue and may know better...
Desiree
--
On 18 Mar 2016, at 11:48, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]')">[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it’s a great comment, and support the NCSG endorsing it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Marilia Maciel <[log in to unmask]')">[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Wendy. Others? Just reminding everyone that the deadline is today, 23:59 UTC.
>> Best wishes
>> M
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]')">[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> I support endorsing the IAB comment.
>>
>> --Wendy
>>
>> On 03/17/2016 01:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>>> Hi James, thanks for the clarifications you provided.
>>>
>>> Based on this information and considering the little time we have, the
>>> question seems to be: should NCSG endorse IAB's comment on RDAP? It would
>>> be great if our members, specially those in our policy committee, could
>>> share their views on the next hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Marília
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]')">[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
>>>> Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]')">[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
>>>>> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
>>>>> matter to us.
>>>>
>>>> Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Shane
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> [log in to unmask]')">[log in to unmask]
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]')">[log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marília Maciel
>> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
>> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>>
>>