Monika, I am just raising a question about process here. The ICANN Working Group process has a very specific formula for chartering and creation. Ad hoc groupings around issues (here human rights) are differentiated as Working Parties. All I am suggesting is that labels be kept distinct so that there is not confusion among the ICANN crowd, and outside the ICANN crowd. How that is done for the parts of a Working Party should be in ways that also minimize confusion. As you well know in law, words in formal processes have precise meanings. On 2016-04-07 6:55 AM, Zalnieriute, Monika wrote: > > Sam, > > > are You suggesting we cal the Research sub-group of the CCWP a sub-party? > > > ---- > > Dr. Monika Zalnieriute > > Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I > > Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I > cmds.ceu.edu I > > Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I > icann.org I > > Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I > zephiroplatform.org I > > Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I > cihr.eu I > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of > Zalnieriute, Monika <[log in to unmask]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2016 10:50 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [cc-humanrights-research] [cc-humanrights] CCWP-HR > Research: Call for volunteers (reply by 8th April) + Call Update > > I would say that the 'indivisibility' is a relative concept, just like > human rights😊 > > > ---- > > Dr. Monika Zalnieriute > > > Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I > > Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I > cmds.ceu.edu I > > Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I > icann.org I > > Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I > zephiroplatform.org I > > Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I > cihr.eu I > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Sam > Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2016 10:40 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [cc-humanrights-research] [cc-humanrights] CCWP-HR > Research: Call for volunteers (reply by 8th April) + Call Update > All, > > I hate to be the pedantic one here but as I understand this ccWP, it > is a bottom up initiative among ICANN participants. It has no ICANN > chartering process, etc. and hence carries the ad hoc Working Party > (WP) label. It is not a formal ICANN Working Group (WG). > > I hope I am correct in asking that all communications use proper > identifiers, and call it a Working Party, and not a group, or there > may be unnecessary and troublesome confusion both inside ICANN and > outside ICANN. > > Sam Lanfranco, NPOC > --------------------------------------------------------------------- [Rest deleted]