/Niels, // // //Well, as an empiricist I suggest we just let it flow and test the no confusion hypothesis. // // //Sam / On 07/04/2016 12:51 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > Hi Sam, > > I don't think the word 'group' is claimed anywhere in ICANN, so I don't > understand using the term 'subgroup' poses a problem or creates unclarity. > > The 'subgroup on PDPs' follows PDPs, so I also don't understand how that > is an issue, similar to the 'subgroup on workstream 2'. > > Best, > > Niels >