/Niels, //
//
//Well, as an empiricist I suggest we just let it flow and test the no 
confusion hypothesis. //
//
//Sam /

On 07/04/2016 12:51 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I don't think the word 'group' is claimed anywhere in ICANN, so I don't
> understand using the term 'subgroup' poses a problem or creates unclarity.
>
> The 'subgroup on PDPs' follows PDPs, so I also don't understand how that
> is an issue, similar to the 'subgroup on workstream 2'.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>