+ 1 On 4/20/2016 5:42 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote: > I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic mission. > > --MM > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >> James Gannon >> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign >> >> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related >> campaign. >> >> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be >> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to >> endorse? >> >> >> >> >> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." >> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be >>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion. >>> -- Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org E: [log in to unmask] | T: +44.771.247.2987