Agreed. Thanks, Robin > On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > @Milton +1 > > > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote: > >> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic mission. >> >> --MM >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >>> James Gannon >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM >>> To: [log in to unmask] >>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign >>> >>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related >>> campaign. >>> >>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be >>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to >>> endorse? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." >>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be >>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion. >>>> >