Yes , +1 and Definitely!

This is a good initiative worthy of our support!

regards

Karel

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Agreed.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
> > On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > @Milton +1
> >
> >
> > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> > +506 8837 7176
> > Skype: carlos.raulg
> > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
> > On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> >
> >> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these
> initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its
> members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to
> be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic
> mission.
> >>
> >> --MM
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> >>> James Gannon
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
> >>>
> >>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure
> related
> >>> campaign.
> >>>
> >>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this
> may be
> >>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to
> >>> endorse?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> G."
> >>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also
> be
> >>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.
> >>>>
> >
>