Yes , +1 and Definitely! This is a good initiative worthy of our support! regards Karel On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Agreed. > > Thanks, > Robin > > > On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > > @Milton +1 > > > > > > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > > +506 8837 7176 > > Skype: carlos.raulg > > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > > On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote: > > > >> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these > initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its > members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to > be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic > mission. > >> > >> --MM > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > >>> James Gannon > >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM > >>> To: [log in to unmask] > >>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign > >>> > >>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure > related > >>> campaign. > >>> > >>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this > may be > >>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to > >>> endorse? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > G." > >>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also > be > >>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion. > >>>> > > >