Thank you Avri,

I will stay away from differentiating instead view them as interrelated the issues, as one depends on the other.

I agree with your views about lending our support , but I disagree with the fact that NCSG do not have the capacity even if it were to constrained to the mission. Especially as these issues evolve everyday.

Thank you,
Benjamin




On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:53 PM, avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi,


On 23-Apr-16 12:10, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> So it will be fair to look at some of the purposes of these campaigns
> and decide if you will support it or be against it because in the long
> run they may affect the DNS issues that affect the NCUC members in
> those regions or countries.


Are you differentiating between support,

- as in lending our name (NCSG) as an organization that thinks this is a
good idea,support,
- as in doing actual work.

If so, the first type costs us nothing but lends our weigh to a related
activity that we see positive value in.

The second is the one that seem impossible from a capacity and priority
perspective, And is possibly out of mission, if indeed we constrain our
mission that way, which I think is another open issue.

avri




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus