Monika,

I am just raising a question about process here. The ICANN Working Group process has a very specific formula for chartering and creation. Ad hoc groupings around issues (here human rights) are differentiated as Working Parties. All I am suggesting is that labels be kept distinct so that there is not confusion among the ICANN crowd, and outside the ICANN crowd. How that is done for the parts of a Working Party should be in ways that also minimize confusion. As you well know in law, words in formal processes have precise meanings.

On 2016-04-07 6:55 AM, Zalnieriute, Monika wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

Sam,


are You suggesting we cal the Research sub-group of the CCWP a sub-party?


----

Dr. Monika Zalnieriute

Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I

Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I cmds.ceu.edu I

Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org I

Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I zephiroplatform.org I

Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I cihr.eu I


From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Zalnieriute, Monika <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 10:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights-research] [cc-humanrights] CCWP-HR Research: Call for volunteers (reply by 8th April) + Call Update
 

I would say that the 'indivisibility' is a relative concept, just like human rights&#X1f60a


----

Dr. Monika Zalnieriute


Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I

Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I cmds.ceu.edu I

Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org I

Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I zephiroplatform.org I

Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I cihr.eu I



From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 10:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights-research] [cc-humanrights] CCWP-HR Research: Call for volunteers (reply by 8th April) + Call Update
 
All,

I hate to be the pedantic one here but as I understand this ccWP, it is a bottom up initiative among ICANN participants. It has no ICANN chartering process, etc. and hence carries the ad hoc Working Party (WP) label. It is not a formal ICANN Working Group (WG).

I hope I am correct in asking that all communications use proper identifiers, and call it a Working Party, and not a group, or there may be unnecessary and troublesome confusion both inside ICANN and outside ICANN.

Sam Lanfranco, NPOC
---------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Rest deleted]