Sorry, I meant ICG proposal of course. Thanks for the corrections off-list! On 05/25/2016 05:20 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > I think this is a very weird use of the IETF slogan. The code (IANA > functions) is running, and was running, and will be running. That is why > the CSG proposal was easier than the CCWG proposal. > > > On 05/25/2016 04:40 PM, David Post wrote: >> But the other hals of the old IETF equation is critical, too: "Running >> Code." Having arrived at consensus is no guarantee that the system will >> actually work as planned. Nobody knows if this code will run smoothly >> or not, and it seems perfectly sensible to say we should find that out >> before we adopt it. Of course, delay has costs - but it has the very >> significant advantage that it is not irrevocable. > -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9