Niels,

I can’t read your response. Could you paste it into an e-mail?

In terms of the ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors, my only comment is that there is no explicit consequence listed, e.g. violation of these standards will result in a probationary period and a second violation will lead ICANN to deny in person registration/participation to ICANN meetings.

Best,

Brett


________________________________
Brett Schaefer
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
202-608-6097
heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 6:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors

It might not have been totally clear, but I would like to discuss this
as being an NCSG statement.

Best,

Niels

On 05/31/2016 09:27 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I hope this email finds you all well. As you might have seen, the public
> comments to the Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors have
> been opened.
>
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/expected-standards-revisions-2016-05-16-en<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/expected-standards-revisions-2016-05-16-en>
>
> I have drafted an initial response here:
>
> https://pad.riseup.net/p/icannharassment<https://pad.riseup.net/p/icannharassment>
>
> Looking forward to discuss.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>

--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org>

PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9