Niels,
I can’t read your response. Could you paste it into an e-mail?
In terms of the ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors, my only comment is that there is no explicit consequence listed, e.g. violation of these standards will
result in a probationary period and a second violation will lead ICANN to deny in person registration/participation to ICANN meetings.
Best,
Brett
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 6:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors
It might not have been totally clear, but I would like to discuss this
as being an NCSG statement.
Best,
Niels
On 05/31/2016 09:27 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I hope this email finds you all well. As you might have seen, the public
> comments to the Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors have
> been opened.
>
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/expected-standards-revisions-2016-05-16-en
>
> I have drafted an initial response here:
>
> https://pad.riseup.net/p/icannharassment
>
> Looking forward to discuss.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9