Absolute +1 anyone who listened to the hearing will know Brett was for the
later. Andrew/Steve seem to be on point for the few minutes I followed.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 24 May 2016 17:29, "McTim" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Steve supports the transition.
>
> It seems that heritage does not...at least not without a soft trial period.
>
> I would hope that the NCSG position is the former and not the latter.
>
> --
>
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Agreed Carlos.
>>
>> Attached please  find a copy of Brett's written testimony today before
>> the United States Senate.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From*: "Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask]>
>> *Sent*: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:38 PM
>> *To*: [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject*: great opening statement by Brett
>>
>> I liked it very much Brett. Congrats
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>