Absolute +1 anyone who listened to the hearing will know Brett was for the later. Andrew/Steve seem to be on point for the few minutes I followed. Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 24 May 2016 17:29, "McTim" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Steve supports the transition. > > It seems that heritage does not...at least not without a soft trial period. > > I would hope that the NCSG position is the former and not the latter. > > -- > > Cheers, > > McTim > "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route > indicates how we get there." Jon Postel > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> Agreed Carlos. >> >> Attached please find a copy of Brett's written testimony today before >> the United States Senate. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From*: "Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask]> >> *Sent*: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:38 PM >> *To*: [log in to unmask] >> *Subject*: great opening statement by Brett >> >> I liked it very much Brett. Congrats >> >> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >> +506 8837 7176 >> Skype: carlos.raulg >> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >> >> > > > > -- > >