On May 24, 2016, at 19:31, avri doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi,

I hope as you do McTim, but it is hard to know - NCSG is one of those
big tents we hear of.

I agree with those who argue that the soft transition delay is just
another way to try to kill transition and puts all the arguments for the
bottom up Multistakeholder process at risk.  Steve called it when he
indicated that delay was just another way to re-litigate the issues.

And I agree with those who said stopping now was broken.

avri


On 24-May-16 12:26, McTim wrote:

Steve supports the transition.

It seems that heritage does not...at least not without a soft trial
period.

I would hope that the NCSG position is the former and not the latter.

--

Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel



On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

   Agreed Carlos.

   Attached please  find a copy of Brett's written testimony today
   before the United States Senate.



   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
   *From*: "Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <[log in to unmask]
   <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
   *Sent*: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:38 PM
   *To*: [log in to unmask]
   <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
   *Subject*: great opening statement by Brett

   I liked it very much Brett. Congrats

   Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
   +506 8837 7176 <tel:%2B506%208837%207176>
   Skype: carlos.raulg
   Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)





--

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus