+1 - anyone wants to redraft? On 06/02/2016 04:57 AM, Dorothy K. Gordon wrote: > Yes, a good start but with potentially unfortunate unintended consequences unless all of the elements raised; definition of terms, penalties, specifics for conference environments etc. are addressed. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wisdom Donkor" <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 10:30:16 PM > Subject: Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors > > +1 to Avri > > On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, Cheryl Langdon-Orr < [log in to unmask] > wrote: >> I also agree with Avri on this matter... >> >> On 2 Jun 2016 6:49 am, "Tatiana Tropina" < [log in to unmask] > wrote: >> >> + 1 to Avri, >> I think this is my problem with this public comment draft (and I left several comments about this in the doc). We do need more, but some of the issues require more time for elaboration. I don't think we can criticise ICANN for the fact that we haven't got more yet, when the document we are commenting on says that the work is in progress. >> So agree with the positive comment that will say that it's good start but there is definitely an important work to be done further. >> Cheers >> Tanya >> On 1 June 2016 at 19:24, avri doria < [log in to unmask] > wrote: >>> >>> On 31-May-16 15:58, Mueller, Milton L wrote: >>>> From what I can read, I would not support the proposed policy. >>> >>> I find myself agreeing with the comment that we will eventually need >>> something more. >>> And I think that RFC7704 is a good model. >>> >>> But I think getting into that issue before we resolve wider >>> accountability issues WS2 (e.g. ombudsman, or SOAC accountabity) of the >>> CCWG-Accountabity is impracticable. I would suggest a statement that >>> said good start, lets go with this for now, and determine after WS2, >>> perhaps in next ATRT, whether more needs to be done. Some element of the >>> issue could probably also feed into WS2 work. >>> >>> avri >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> > -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9