Hi,
Would like to get the NCSG range of views on ICANN's plan/rationale for
secondment of all PTI staff in perpetuity.
The position I have taken personally is:
- I accept that in the initial instance, in consideration of the current
employees and of stability, it makes sense to second those IANA
employees that wish to the PTI.
- with the exception of the PTI managerPresident (if they happen to be
the same person) who I feel might have a conflict of interest in terms
of ICANN the employer and PTI the fiduciary responsibility. I think that
from day 0, this executive level employee should be a PTI employee
reporting solely to the PTI board.
- i think that replacement staff should be employed by PTI and not
ICANN. there is an issue with having two sort of employees, those
seconded from day 0 and new employees, but as long as staff are treated
well and equitably this shouldn't be a problem.
The CWG proposal did not get into this, though I think many of us
thought at the time that PTI staff would be PTI employees as part of the
separability formula.
avri
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:05:05 +0000
From: Yuko Green <
[log in to unmask]>
To:
[log in to unmask] <
[log in to unmask]>
Dear members of the IOTF,
Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing recommendations we
have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward
to hearing any feedback you may have.
Regards,
*Yuko Green*
Strategic Programs Manager
Global Domains Division
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693
Mobile: +1 310 745 1517
E-mail:
[log in to unmask] <
mailto:[log in to unmask]>
www.icann.org <
http://www.icann.org/>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus