or perhaps call for an open group so that anyone can join? On 24 June 2016 at 08:01, Dorothy K. Gordon < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > In theory your approach would be ideal but given the deadlines would it be > effectively possible? Perhaps Council + a few others? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Gannon" <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 6:12:30 AM > Subject: Council Item for Disussion > > > Hi All, > As we know there are many changes coming for the role of the GNSO with our > new accountability powers, I want to call out the following item on the > council agenda for Helsinki > > * Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Approval to Form a Drafting Team to Develop > an Implementation Plan for New and Additional GNSO Powers and Obligations > under the Revised ICANN Bylaws (15 minutes) > > I have to say that I am concerned about this, this is a critical item for > the GNSO and will set its strategic view and position for the next 5-7 > years most likely, I don’t fee very comfortable with this being done in a > potentially top down manner by council, I feel that this should be > developed in a bottom up manner by the SGs and C’s first. > > > I would be interested in others thoughts so that we can guide the PC on a > position on this > > > > > James > -- Farzaneh